<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ParkerHayden Newsroom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.parkerhayden.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.parkerhayden.com</link>
	<description>Hotness from Houston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:56:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook Fraud: &#8220;Send money now!&#8221; by dastsectReugs</title>
		<link>http://news.parkerhayden.com/facebook-fraud-send-money-now/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>dastsectReugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.parkerhayden.com/?p=280#comment-188</guid>
		<description>The response to national disaster is awesome but it&#039;s a real shame that so many people take advantage of the negative situations.

I mean everytime there is an earthquake, a flood, an oil spill - there&#039;s always a group of heartless people who rip off tax payers.

This is in response to reading that 4 of Oprah Winfreys &quot;angels&quot; got busted ripping off the system.  Shame on them!
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/08/19/crimesider/entry5251471.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The response to national disaster is awesome but it&#8217;s a real shame that so many people take advantage of the negative situations.</p>
<p>I mean everytime there is an earthquake, a flood, an oil spill &#8211; there&#8217;s always a group of heartless people who rip off tax payers.</p>
<p>This is in response to reading that 4 of Oprah Winfreys &#8220;angels&#8221; got busted ripping off the system.  Shame on them!<br />
<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/08/19/crimesider/entry5251471.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/08/19/crimesider/entry5251471.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why We Like Awards,Thank You Very Much. by lab</title>
		<link>http://news.parkerhayden.com/why-we-like-awardsthank-you-very-much/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.parkerhayden.com/?p=262#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget about Communication Arts.  I love that book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget about Communication Arts.  I love that book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I Don&#8217;t Like Twilight&#8230;Now&#8230;Get Off My Lawn! by lab</title>
		<link>http://news.parkerhayden.com/twiblight/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.parkerhayden.com/?p=342#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LinkedIn Open Networking: Are you a LION or a Mouse? by Brian McCUe</title>
		<link>http://news.parkerhayden.com/linkedin-open-networking-are-you-a-lion-or-a-mouse/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian McCUe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.parkerhayden.com/?p=263#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Mark, very well said! The economy and the unemployment rate have lead to the dramatic growth of these social networking sites. You bring to light what so many overlook. We have always had contacts and acquaintances, but what really counts in business and life are our relationships and friends. Good thing there are more mice than lions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, very well said! The economy and the unemployment rate have lead to the dramatic growth of these social networking sites. You bring to light what so many overlook. We have always had contacts and acquaintances, but what really counts in business and life are our relationships and friends. Good thing there are more mice than lions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook Fraud: &#8220;Send money now!&#8221; by Laura</title>
		<link>http://news.parkerhayden.com/facebook-fraud-send-money-now/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.parkerhayden.com/?p=280#comment-42</guid>
		<description>love your comments in (__). What an experience!! thanks for being a true friend.
Laura (the real one)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love your comments in (__). What an experience!! thanks for being a true friend.<br />
Laura (the real one)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook Fraud: &#8220;Send money now!&#8221; by Mark Hayden</title>
		<link>http://news.parkerhayden.com/facebook-fraud-send-money-now/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.parkerhayden.com/?p=280#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Quick update: Laura got this email 28 hours later from Facebook: 

Your account has been temporarily suspended for security purposes. Our
systems indicate that your Facebook account has been compromised by
cybercriminals attempting to impersonate you. These criminals often will try
to trick your friends into sending them money by claiming that you are stuck
in a far away location and need assistance. It is possible that your email
account was compromised as well. As such, we have sent this email to all
email accounts recently associated with your account. Obtaining access to a
victim&#039;s email is one of the primary ways these cybercriminals have been
operating. Please take the following steps to regain control of your
account:

1. Select new, unique passwords for any email addresses associated with your
Facebook account.

2. Respond to this email with the answer to your security question:
What was the first concert you attended?

3. Closely follow the instructions provided in our follow up email. We also
encourage you to visit the following page for more information about
Facebook security and how to report suspicious material:
http://www.facebook.com/security

Thanks,
Facebook Security</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick update: Laura got this email 28 hours later from Facebook: </p>
<p>Your account has been temporarily suspended for security purposes. Our<br />
systems indicate that your Facebook account has been compromised by<br />
cybercriminals attempting to impersonate you. These criminals often will try<br />
to trick your friends into sending them money by claiming that you are stuck<br />
in a far away location and need assistance. It is possible that your email<br />
account was compromised as well. As such, we have sent this email to all<br />
email accounts recently associated with your account. Obtaining access to a<br />
victim&#8217;s email is one of the primary ways these cybercriminals have been<br />
operating. Please take the following steps to regain control of your<br />
account:</p>
<p>1. Select new, unique passwords for any email addresses associated with your<br />
Facebook account.</p>
<p>2. Respond to this email with the answer to your security question:<br />
What was the first concert you attended?</p>
<p>3. Closely follow the instructions provided in our follow up email. We also<br />
encourage you to visit the following page for more information about<br />
Facebook security and how to report suspicious material:<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/security" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/security</a></p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Facebook Security</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on “Paranormal Activity”: A Great Lesson for Marketers Whose Budgets Are Being Dragged Away by Sean Cafferky</title>
		<link>http://news.parkerhayden.com/%e2%80%9cparanormal-activity%e2%80%9d-a-great-lesson-for-marketers-whose-budgets-are-being-dragged-away/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Cafferky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.parkerhayden.com/?p=95#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Uh, wow. 

I saw this movie last night. It&#039;s clearly targeted at 12 to 15 year old girls, primarily white, primarily suburban, primarily upper middle class, primarily bubbleheaded.

It may have some secondary appeal to a small percentage of other audiences, here and there, based on how naive those people are and/or how pre-disposed they are to going along with suspension of disbelief when watching anything at all. You know, people who watch mobile phone movies of dogs humping cats and the like.

I think it&#039;s great for those rich little girls. I find it amusing that anyone else were to find any entertainment value in it. It&#039;s definitely not for anyone with real world experience beyond junior high school.

Get real. Try showing that film to some urban kids. Or a group of 18 year olds. 90% of them wouldn&#039;t sit through the whole thing unless forced. 

Having said that, I should mention the lead actress did a near flawless job in her role as the kind of girlfriend which upper-middleclass 13 year old girls imagine they&#039;d like to be. The expensive furniture in the gigantic house owned by the rich semi-attractive boyfriend was a nice fantasy considering neither of the protagonists had jobs (nor would be capable of holding a job).  She was basically perfect in her execution: a sort of Hannah Montana at age 24 except without actually growing up.

And I applaud the movie studio for pumping up the ten million dollar hype machine and netting a six fold return. It&#039;s truly amazing what you can sell. Pet rocks, anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, wow. </p>
<p>I saw this movie last night. It&#8217;s clearly targeted at 12 to 15 year old girls, primarily white, primarily suburban, primarily upper middle class, primarily bubbleheaded.</p>
<p>It may have some secondary appeal to a small percentage of other audiences, here and there, based on how naive those people are and/or how pre-disposed they are to going along with suspension of disbelief when watching anything at all. You know, people who watch mobile phone movies of dogs humping cats and the like.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s great for those rich little girls. I find it amusing that anyone else were to find any entertainment value in it. It&#8217;s definitely not for anyone with real world experience beyond junior high school.</p>
<p>Get real. Try showing that film to some urban kids. Or a group of 18 year olds. 90% of them wouldn&#8217;t sit through the whole thing unless forced. </p>
<p>Having said that, I should mention the lead actress did a near flawless job in her role as the kind of girlfriend which upper-middleclass 13 year old girls imagine they&#8217;d like to be. The expensive furniture in the gigantic house owned by the rich semi-attractive boyfriend was a nice fantasy considering neither of the protagonists had jobs (nor would be capable of holding a job).  She was basically perfect in her execution: a sort of Hannah Montana at age 24 except without actually growing up.</p>
<p>And I applaud the movie studio for pumping up the ten million dollar hype machine and netting a six fold return. It&#8217;s truly amazing what you can sell. Pet rocks, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PepsiCo&#8217;s Amp App:  Offensive or no? by markph</title>
		<link>http://news.parkerhayden.com/pepsicos-amp-app-offensive-or-no/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>markph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.parkerhayden.com/pepsicos-amp-app-offensive-or-no/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I think everyone just needs to lighten up. Their market loved it--both men and women--and it was all in good fun. A few prude women complained and they collapsed under pressure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think everyone just needs to lighten up. Their market loved it&#8211;both men and women&#8211;and it was all in good fun. A few prude women complained and they collapsed under pressure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PepsiCo&#8217;s Amp App:  Offensive or no? by demonpixel</title>
		<link>http://news.parkerhayden.com/pepsicos-amp-app-offensive-or-no/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>demonpixel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.parkerhayden.com/pepsicos-amp-app-offensive-or-no/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Was it offensive to the four fashion designers that George Lois grouped Tommy Hilfiger with when he launched that ad campaign? Probably so.

Advertising is not the same thing as church. And in advertising, creating buzz from borderline offensive content in the name of humor has always been normal, even necessary.

Get over it. No one died from downloading this app. Pepsi is the choice of a new generation, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was it offensive to the four fashion designers that George Lois grouped Tommy Hilfiger with when he launched that ad campaign? Probably so.</p>
<p>Advertising is not the same thing as church. And in advertising, creating buzz from borderline offensive content in the name of humor has always been normal, even necessary.</p>
<p>Get over it. No one died from downloading this app. Pepsi is the choice of a new generation, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on “Paranormal Activity”: A Great Lesson for Marketers Whose Budgets Are Being Dragged Away by Tim Selaty</title>
		<link>http://news.parkerhayden.com/%e2%80%9cparanormal-activity%e2%80%9d-a-great-lesson-for-marketers-whose-budgets-are-being-dragged-away/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Selaty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.parkerhayden.com/?p=95#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I had seen the movie the night it was released in my local area. I had not seen previews or reviews before stepping into the theater itself other than it was a amateur made film on a low budget. 

This added to my low expectations.. however, when the movie was playing I found it far more frightening to see a normal camcorder video taping the scenes.

Most older camcorders have a static film grain to them and resonate a certain frequency... by making this film seem as realistic as possible was an excellent goal and standard to set. We see far too many generated graphics and effects to believe what&#039;s real in a movie and what isn&#039;t. There was a particularly inspiring scene with a wee-gee board. The only effects made were a sound clip, wind, and the eyeglass piece for the board moving around. Very inexpensive and added what I want to call the climax of the movie. How cool is that?

We need shift the trend more towards reality, here and now and less towards robots and the future. 

&lt;cite&gt; Think: when will actors really become obsolete? If in these times real actors are becoming CGI effects, just like backgrounds and blood, then where will we be when several of my friends, who are in theatre studies, want to make it big? &lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lovehatemedia.com/is-cgi-ruining-film/&quot; title=&quot;CGI ruining movies&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CGI Ruining Movies&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had seen the movie the night it was released in my local area. I had not seen previews or reviews before stepping into the theater itself other than it was a amateur made film on a low budget. </p>
<p>This added to my low expectations.. however, when the movie was playing I found it far more frightening to see a normal camcorder video taping the scenes.</p>
<p>Most older camcorders have a static film grain to them and resonate a certain frequency&#8230; by making this film seem as realistic as possible was an excellent goal and standard to set. We see far too many generated graphics and effects to believe what&#8217;s real in a movie and what isn&#8217;t. There was a particularly inspiring scene with a wee-gee board. The only effects made were a sound clip, wind, and the eyeglass piece for the board moving around. Very inexpensive and added what I want to call the climax of the movie. How cool is that?</p>
<p>We need shift the trend more towards reality, here and now and less towards robots and the future. </p>
<p><cite> Think: when will actors really become obsolete? If in these times real actors are becoming CGI effects, just like backgrounds and blood, then where will we be when several of my friends, who are in theatre studies, want to make it big? </cite><br />
<a href="http://www.lovehatemedia.com/is-cgi-ruining-film/" title="CGI ruining movies" rel="nofollow">CGI Ruining Movies</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

